Indian Patent Law

Anton Piller Orders and Mareva Injunctions in Indian Patent Litigation

Leave a Comment / Patent Article

Patent litigation is as much a battle of speed and strategy as it is one of legal argument. An infringer who receives advance notice of impending legal action has every incentive and often every means to destroy evidence, conceal infringing goods or dissipate assets before the plaintiff can secure relief. The law, recognising this vulnerability, […]

Anton Piller Orders and Mareva Injunctions in Indian Patent Litigation Read More »

Patent Suit - Jurisdiction, Procedure and the Commercial Courts Act

Patent Suit – Jurisdiction, Procedure and the Commercial Courts Act

Leave a Comment / Patent Article

Intellectual property litigation in India has undergone a transformation of considerable significance over the past decade and nowhere is this transformation more visible than in the conduct of patent suits. The enactment of the Commercial Courts Act, 2015, the establishment of specialised intellectual property divisions in the High Courts, the introduction of case management procedures

Patent Suit – Jurisdiction, Procedure and the Commercial Courts Act Read More »

Remedies for Patent Infringement – Injunctions, Damages and Accounts of Profits

Remedies for Patent Infringement – Injunctions, Damages and Accounts of Profits

Leave a Comment / Patent Article

The enforcement of a patent right is only as meaningful as the remedies available when that right is infringed. A patent that cannot be effectively enforced whose violation attracts only nominal consequences or whose vindication requires years of inconclusive litigation provides little real protection to the inventor and little genuine deterrence to would-be infringers. Conversely,

Remedies for Patent Infringement – Injunctions, Damages and Accounts of Profits Read More »

Defences-to-patent-infringement-section-107-and-beyond

Defences to Patent Infringement – Section 107 and Beyond

Leave a Comment / Patent Article

Patent infringement litigation in India, as in every major patent jurisdiction, is rarely a simple contest between an unimpeachable patent and an undeniable act of infringement. The defendant in a patent infringement suit has available to it a range of defences    statutory, equitable and procedural that can defeat or substantially limit the plaintiff’s claim even

Defences to Patent Infringement – Section 107 and Beyond Read More »

Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson (Publ) v. Competition Commission r

Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson (Publ) v. Competition Commission of India & Another

Leave a Comment / patent case laws

High Court of Delhi at New Delhi | Decided: 30 March 2016 W.P.(C) No. 464/2014 & W.P.(C) No. 1006/2014 Bench: Hon’ble Mr. Justice Vibhu Bakhru Background Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson (Publ), a company incorporated under the laws of Sweden and one of the world’s largest telecommunications companies, filed two writ petitions challenging orders passed by the

Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson (Publ) v. Competition Commission of India & Another Read More »

Patenet infringement section 48

Patent Infringement in India: What Constitutes Infringement under Section 48 of the Patents Act, 1970

Leave a Comment / Patent Article

A patent, at its core, is a bargain between the inventor and the state. The inventor discloses the invention to the public in full; the state, in return, grants a limited monopoly for twenty years. The value of that monopoly depends entirely on how effectively it can be enforced. An unenforceable patent right is no

Patent Infringement in India: What Constitutes Infringement under Section 48 of the Patents Act, 1970 Read More »

Nandhini Deluxe v. Karnataka Co-operative Milk Producers

Koninklijke Philips Electronics N.V. v. Rajesh Bansal & Ors.

Leave a Comment / patent case laws

Delhi High Court | Mukta Gupta J. | 12 July 2018 Case Numbers: CS(COMM) 24/2016; CS(COMM) 436/2017 Justice Mukta Gupta BACKGROUND The plaintiff, Koninklijke Philips Electronics N.V., a Netherlands-incorporated multinational corporation, instituted two suits alleging infringement of its Indian Patent No. 184753 relating to DVD video player technology. The patent, dated 13 February 1995, pertains

Koninklijke Philips Electronics N.V. v. Rajesh Bansal & Ors. Read More »

Government Use of Patents - Section 99 to 103

Government Use of Patents – Section 99 to 103 of the Patents Act, 1970

Leave a Comment / Patent Article

The relationship between sovereign power and private intellectual property rights has been one of the most contested and consequential questions in the design of patent systems since the earliest days of modern patent law. A patent grants its holder a monopoly a right to exclude all others, including the state, from using the patented invention

Government Use of Patents – Section 99 to 103 of the Patents Act, 1970 Read More »