Indian Patent Law

Remedies for Patent Infringement – Injunctions, Damages and Accounts of Profits

Leave a Comment / Patent Article

The enforcement of a patent right is only as meaningful as the remedies available when that right is infringed. A patent that cannot be effectively enforced whose violation attracts only nominal consequences or whose vindication requires years of inconclusive litigation provides little real protection to the inventor and little genuine deterrence to would-be infringers. Conversely,

Remedies for Patent Infringement – Injunctions, Damages and Accounts of Profits Read More »

Defences to Patent Infringement – Section 107 and Beyond

Leave a Comment / Patent Article

Patent infringement litigation in India, as in every major patent jurisdiction, is rarely a simple contest between an unimpeachable patent and an undeniable act of infringement. The defendant in a patent infringement suit has available to it a range of defences    statutory, equitable and procedural that can defeat or substantially limit the plaintiff’s claim even

Defences to Patent Infringement – Section 107 and Beyond Read More »

Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson (Publ) v. Competition Commission of India & Another

Leave a Comment / Landmark Judgements on Patents

High Court of Delhi at New Delhi | Decided: 30 March 2016 W.P.(C) No. 464/2014 & W.P.(C) No. 1006/2014 Bench: Hon’ble Mr. Justice Vibhu Bakhru Background Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson (Publ), a company incorporated under the laws of Sweden and one of the world’s largest telecommunications companies, filed two writ petitions challenging orders passed by the

Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson (Publ) v. Competition Commission of India & Another Read More »

Patent Infringement in India: What Constitutes Infringement under Section 48 of the Patents Act, 1970

Leave a Comment / Patent Article

A patent, at its core, is a bargain between the inventor and the state. The inventor discloses the invention to the public in full; the state, in return, grants a limited monopoly for twenty years. The value of that monopoly depends entirely on how effectively it can be enforced. An unenforceable patent right is no

Patent Infringement in India: What Constitutes Infringement under Section 48 of the Patents Act, 1970 Read More »

Teva Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd. & Ors. v. Natcopharma Limited

Leave a Comment / Landmark Judgements on Patents

High Court of Delhi | 28 February 2014 CS (OS) 3193 of 2012 & CC No. 49 of 2013, IA Nos. 10389-90 of 2013, 10638 of 2013, 20025 of 2013, 18788 of 2013 Hon’ble Mr. Justice S. Muralidhar BACKGROUND The plaintiffs in the present matter are Teva Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd. (“Teva”), Yeda Research and Development

Teva Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd. & Ors. v. Natcopharma Limited Read More »

Koninklijke Philips Electronics N.V. v. Rajesh Bansal & Ors.

Leave a Comment / Landmark Judgements on Patents

Delhi High Court | Mukta Gupta J. | 12 July 2018 Case Numbers: CS(COMM) 24/2016; CS(COMM) 436/2017 Justice Mukta Gupta BACKGROUND The plaintiff, Koninklijke Philips Electronics N.V., a Netherlands-incorporated multinational corporation, instituted two suits alleging infringement of its Indian Patent No. 184753 relating to DVD video player technology. The patent, dated 13 February 1995, pertains

Koninklijke Philips Electronics N.V. v. Rajesh Bansal & Ors. Read More »

Standipack Private Limited & Another v. M/s Oswal Trading Co. Ltd. & Ors.

Leave a Comment / Landmark Judgements on Patents

Delhi High Court | Dr. M.K. Sharma J. | 26 May 1999 Case Number: Suit No. 2391/1998 | Citation: AIR 2000 Delhi 23 | 80 (1999) DLT 56 | 1999 IV AD (Delhi) 613 BACKGROUND The plaintiff, Standipack Private Limited, claimed to be the patentee of a pouch designed for storage and dispensing of liquids

Standipack Private Limited & Another v. M/s Oswal Trading Co. Ltd. & Ors. Read More »

Government Use of Patents – Section 99 to 103 of the Patents Act, 1970

Leave a Comment / Patent Article

The relationship between sovereign power and private intellectual property rights has been one of the most contested and consequential questions in the design of patent systems since the earliest days of modern patent law. A patent grants its holder a monopoly a right to exclude all others, including the state, from using the patented invention

Government Use of Patents – Section 99 to 103 of the Patents Act, 1970 Read More »

Parallel Imports and Section 107A – The Bolar Exemption and Doctrine of Exhaustion in Indian Patent Law

Leave a Comment / Patent Article

Among the most practically significant yet doctrinally complex provisions of the Patents Act, 1970 is Section 107A, inserted into the Act by the Patents (Amendment) Act, 2002. In the two decades since its insertion, Section 107A has become one of the most contested and commercially consequential provisions in Indian pharmaceutical patent law, engaging questions that

Parallel Imports and Section 107A – The Bolar Exemption and Doctrine of Exhaustion in Indian Patent Law Read More »

Working of Patents in India – Section 83, Form 27 and Consequences

Leave a Comment / Patent Article

Few obligations in Indian patent law are as frequently misunderstood, as consistently neglected and as consequential in their implications as the requirement to work a patent in India. The Patents Act, 1970 does not treat the grant of a patent as the end of the patentee’s obligations to the public it treats it as the

Working of Patents in India – Section 83, Form 27 and Consequences Read More »