Intellectual Property Law

colour marks sound marks and non traditional trademark patenevo.in

Colour Marks, Sound Marks and Non-Traditional Trademarks in India

The history of trademark law is, in significant part, a history of expanding frontiers. What began as a system designed to protect word marks and simple devices the merchant’s mark stamped on goods to identify their origin has evolved over centuries into a framework broad enough, in principle, to accommodate almost any sign capable of […]

Colour Marks, Sound Marks and Non-Traditional Trademarks in India Read More »

Descriptive Marks and the Acquired Distinctiveness

Descriptive Marks and the Acquired Distinctiveness Doctrine in Indian Trademark Law

Of all the categories of marks that traverse the trademark registration process in India, descriptive marks present the most nuanced and intellectually demanding set of questions. They occupy the contested middle ground of the distinctiveness spectrum neither inherently protectable like fanciful or arbitrary marks, nor wholly beyond protection like generic terms and their treatment reveals,

Descriptive Marks and the Acquired Distinctiveness Doctrine in Indian Trademark Law Read More »

Government Use of Patents - Section 99 to 103

Government Use of Patents – Section 99 to 103 of the Patents Act, 1970

The relationship between sovereign power and private intellectual property rights has been one of the most contested and consequential questions in the design of patent systems since the earliest days of modern patent law. A patent grants its holder a monopoly a right to exclude all others, including the state, from using the patented invention

Government Use of Patents – Section 99 to 103 of the Patents Act, 1970 Read More »

Parallel Imports and Section 107A - The Bolar Exemption and Doctrine of Exhaustion

Parallel Imports and Section 107A – The Bolar Exemption and Doctrine of Exhaustion in Indian Patent Law

Among the most practically significant yet doctrinally complex provisions of the Patents Act, 1970 is Section 107A, inserted into the Act by the Patents (Amendment) Act, 2002. In the two decades since its insertion, Section 107A has become one of the most contested and commercially consequential provisions in Indian pharmaceutical patent law, engaging questions that

Parallel Imports and Section 107A – The Bolar Exemption and Doctrine of Exhaustion in Indian Patent Law Read More »

Working of Patents in India – Section 83, Form 27

Working of Patents in India – Section 83, Form 27 and Consequences

Few obligations in Indian patent law are as frequently misunderstood, as consistently neglected and as consequential in their implications as the requirement to work a patent in India. The Patents Act, 1970 does not treat the grant of a patent as the end of the patentee’s obligations to the public it treats it as the

Working of Patents in India – Section 83, Form 27 and Consequences Read More »

Mattel Inc. & Ors. v. Mr. Jayant Agarwalla & Ors.

Mattel Inc. & Ors. v. Mr. Jayant Agarwalla & Ors.

High Court of Delhi | Justice S. Ravindra Bhat | Date of Decision: 17.09.2008 Case Number: IA No. 2352/2008 in CS (OS) 344/2008 BACKGROUND The plaintiffs comprise a Delaware-incorporated company and its subsidiaries incorporated in the United Kingdom and India, engaged in the manufacture and marketing of toys, games and consumer products. Among their well-known

Mattel Inc. & Ors. v. Mr. Jayant Agarwalla & Ors. Read More »

ITC Limited v. Philip Morris Products SA and Others

ITC Limited v. Philip Morris Products SA and Others

High Court of Delhi | Justice S. Ravindra Bhat | 7 January 2010 I.A. Nos. 12940/2009, 12941/2009 & 12942/2009 in CS(OS) 1894/2009   BACKGROUND The plaintiff, ITC Limited, is described in the pleadings as one of India’s largest private sector companies with an annual turnover of Rs. 23,144 crores, engaged in diverse businesses including hotels,

ITC Limited v. Philip Morris Products SA and Others Read More »

Hindusthan Lever Limited v. Godrej Soaps Limited and Others

Hindusthan Lever Limited v. Godrej Soaps Limited and Others

Court: High Court of Calcutta | Date of Decision: 11 April 1996 Citation: AIR 1996 CAL 367; (1997) 1 CALLT 123 (HC); 100 CWN 562; (1996) 100 Cal WN 562; (1997) 2 CivLJ 302 BACKGROUND The plaintiff, Hindusthan Lever Limited, is a leading Indian manufacturer of soaps, detergents, cleaning preparations, chemicals and fertilisers, holding over

Hindusthan Lever Limited v. Godrej Soaps Limited and Others Read More »

The PCT System and India: International Filing, National Phase Entry and Prosecution Practice

The PCT System and India: International Filing, National Phase Entry and Prosecution Practice

India’s accession to the Patent Cooperation Treaty on December 7, 1998, fundamentally transformed the landscape for both inbound and outbound patent filings. For Indian applicants seeking protection across multiple jurisdictions, the PCT provides a single-window mechanism of unmatched procedural efficiency. For foreign applicants targeting the Indian marketone of the world’s most consequential pharmaceutical, technology and

The PCT System and India: International Filing, National Phase Entry and Prosecution Practice Read More »