Intellectual Property Law

Copyright in Databases

Copyright in Databases and Compilations under Indian Law

The question of whether a collection of information facts, data, references, records or  other pre-existing material assembled into an organised whole deserves intellectual property protection is among the most contested and practically consequential in copyright law. At its core, it forces a direct confrontation with the foundational tension between two equally legitimate values: the interest […]

Copyright in Databases and Compilations under Indian Law Read More »

Copyright and Artificial Intelligence

Copyright and Artificial Intelligence – Who Owns AI-Generated Works?

Few questions in contemporary intellectual property law have generated as much urgency, as much disagreement and as much genuine legal uncertainty as the question of who if anyone owns the copyright in a work generated by artificial intelligence. The question is not merely academic. Generative AI systems now produce novels, compose music, paint images, write

Copyright and Artificial Intelligence – Who Owns AI-Generated Works? Read More »

Deceptive Similarity The Legal Test

Deceptive Similarity The Legal Test Under Indian Trademark Law

No concept in Indian trademark law is more frequently litigated, more extensively analyzed in judicial decisions or more consequential in its practical application than deceptive similarity. It is the standard by which the Trade Marks Registry determines whether a pending application conflicts with an earlier registration, the criterion by which courts assess whether an allegedly

Deceptive Similarity The Legal Test Under Indian Trademark Law Read More »

Trade Dress and Product Shape

Trade Dress and Product Shape as Trademark in India

Among the most commercially significant and doctrinally complex questions in contemporary Indian trademark law is the extent to which the visual and physical appearance of a product or its packaging its trade dress can be protected as a trademark. In a marketplace saturated with competing products, the overall commercial appearance of goods has become one

Trade Dress and Product Shape as Trademark in India Read More »

Colgate Palmolive Company & Anr. vs. Anchor Health and Beauty Care Pvt. Ltd.

Colgate Palmolive Company & Anr. vs. Anchor Health and Beauty Care Pvt. Ltd.

Delhi High Court | J.D. Kapoor J. | 29 October 2003 108 (2003) DLT 51 | 2003(27)PTC478(Del) Background Colgate Palmolive Company (Plaintiff No. 1), a US-incorporated multinational and its Indian subsidiary/licensee Colgate Palmolive (India) Ltd. (Plaintiff No. 2) had been manufacturing and selling tooth powder in India since 1951 in distinctively shaped cans bearing a

Colgate Palmolive Company & Anr. vs. Anchor Health and Beauty Care Pvt. Ltd. Read More »

colour marks sound marks and non traditional trademark patenevo.in

Colour Marks, Sound Marks and Non-Traditional Trademarks in India

The history of trademark law is, in significant part, a history of expanding frontiers. What began as a system designed to protect word marks and simple devices the merchant’s mark stamped on goods to identify their origin has evolved over centuries into a framework broad enough, in principle, to accommodate almost any sign capable of

Colour Marks, Sound Marks and Non-Traditional Trademarks in India Read More »

Descriptive Marks and the Acquired Distinctiveness

Descriptive Marks and the Acquired Distinctiveness Doctrine in Indian Trademark Law

Of all the categories of marks that traverse the trademark registration process in India, descriptive marks present the most nuanced and intellectually demanding set of questions. They occupy the contested middle ground of the distinctiveness spectrum neither inherently protectable like fanciful or arbitrary marks, nor wholly beyond protection like generic terms and their treatment reveals,

Descriptive Marks and the Acquired Distinctiveness Doctrine in Indian Trademark Law Read More »

Government Use of Patents - Section 99 to 103

Government Use of Patents – Section 99 to 103 of the Patents Act, 1970

The relationship between sovereign power and private intellectual property rights has been one of the most contested and consequential questions in the design of patent systems since the earliest days of modern patent law. A patent grants its holder a monopoly a right to exclude all others, including the state, from using the patented invention

Government Use of Patents – Section 99 to 103 of the Patents Act, 1970 Read More »