Intellectual Property Law

Patent Assignment and Transmission in India

Patent Assignment and Transmission in India – Section 68 and 69

The commercial value of a patent lies not only in the right to exclude others from using the patented invention but in the capacity to transfer, assign and transmit that right to move it through the marketplace as a fungible asset that can be bought, sold, mortgaged, inherited and incorporated into the complex webs of […]

Patent Assignment and Transmission in India – Section 68 and 69 Read More »

Parallel Imports and Section 107A - The Bolar Exemption and Doctrine of Exhaustion

Parallel Imports and Section 107A – The Bolar Exemption and Doctrine of Exhaustion in Indian Patent Law

Among the most practically significant yet doctrinally complex provisions of the Patents Act, 1970 is Section 107A, inserted into the Act by the Patents (Amendment) Act, 2002. In the two decades since its insertion, Section 107A has become one of the most contested and commercially consequential provisions in Indian pharmaceutical patent law, engaging questions that

Parallel Imports and Section 107A – The Bolar Exemption and Doctrine of Exhaustion in Indian Patent Law Read More »

Working of Patents in India – Section 83, Form 27

Working of Patents in India – Section 83, Form 27 and Consequences

Few obligations in Indian patent law are as frequently misunderstood, as consistently neglected and as consequential in their implications as the requirement to work a patent in India. The Patents Act, 1970 does not treat the grant of a patent as the end of the patentee’s obligations to the public it treats it as the

Working of Patents in India – Section 83, Form 27 and Consequences Read More »

Mattel Inc. & Ors. v. Mr. Jayant Agarwalla & Ors.

Mattel Inc. & Ors. v. Mr. Jayant Agarwalla & Ors.

High Court of Delhi | Justice S. Ravindra Bhat | Date of Decision: 17.09.2008 Case Number: IA No. 2352/2008 in CS (OS) 344/2008 BACKGROUND The plaintiffs comprise a Delaware-incorporated company and its subsidiaries incorporated in the United Kingdom and India, engaged in the manufacture and marketing of toys, games and consumer products. Among their well-known

Mattel Inc. & Ors. v. Mr. Jayant Agarwalla & Ors. Read More »

ITC Limited v. Philip Morris Products SA and Others

ITC Limited v. Philip Morris Products SA and Others

High Court of Delhi | Justice S. Ravindra Bhat | 7 January 2010 I.A. Nos. 12940/2009, 12941/2009 & 12942/2009 in CS(OS) 1894/2009   BACKGROUND The plaintiff, ITC Limited, is described in the pleadings as one of India’s largest private sector companies with an annual turnover of Rs. 23,144 crores, engaged in diverse businesses including hotels,

ITC Limited v. Philip Morris Products SA and Others Read More »

Hindusthan Lever Limited v. Godrej Soaps Limited and Others

Hindusthan Lever Limited v. Godrej Soaps Limited and Others

Court: High Court of Calcutta | Date of Decision: 11 April 1996 Citation: AIR 1996 CAL 367; (1997) 1 CALLT 123 (HC); 100 CWN 562; (1996) 100 Cal WN 562; (1997) 2 CivLJ 302 BACKGROUND The plaintiff, Hindusthan Lever Limited, is a leading Indian manufacturer of soaps, detergents, cleaning preparations, chemicals and fertilisers, holding over

Hindusthan Lever Limited v. Godrej Soaps Limited and Others Read More »

The PCT System and India: International Filing, National Phase Entry and Prosecution Practice

The PCT System and India: International Filing, National Phase Entry and Prosecution Practice

India’s accession to the Patent Cooperation Treaty on December 7, 1998, fundamentally transformed the landscape for both inbound and outbound patent filings. For Indian applicants seeking protection across multiple jurisdictions, the PCT provides a single-window mechanism of unmatched procedural efficiency. For foreign applicants targeting the Indian marketone of the world’s most consequential pharmaceutical, technology and

The PCT System and India: International Filing, National Phase Entry and Prosecution Practice Read More »

Performer's right and Broadcast reproduction right

Performer’s right and Broadcast reproduction right under The Copyright Act, 1957

Chapter VIII of The Copyright Act, 1957 i.e. rights of broadcasting organisation and of performers in section 37 deals with Broadcast reproduction right and in section 38 with Performer’s right. The Copyright Act, 1957 is principally understood as a statute that protects authors, composers, writers, painters and filmmakers who create original works Yet creative industries

Performer’s right and Broadcast reproduction right under The Copyright Act, 1957 Read More »

Copyright Societies in India : The Collective Licensing Framework, IPRS, PPL and the Statutory Architecture of Sections 33 to 36A

Copyright Societies in India : Statutory Architecture of Sections 33 to 36A

The administration of copyright in creative industries has never been a matter that individual rights holders can manage alone. A composer whose work is performed across thousands of radio stations, hotel lobbies, restaurants and streaming platforms simultaneously cannot possibly negotiate individual licences with each user, monitor unauthorised performances or collect royalties from each source. It

Copyright Societies in India : Statutory Architecture of Sections 33 to 36A Read More »