Trade Marks Act 1999

Bata India Limited vs. Pyare Lal & Co., Meerut City & Ors.

Allahabad High Court | January 23, 1985 | AIR 1985 All 242 A. Banerji, J. Background Bata India Limited is one of India’s most iconic commercial names, having been associated with the manufacture and sale of footwear and related products since before the enactment of the Trade Marks Act, 1940. The name “Bata” derives from

Bata India Limited vs. Pyare Lal & Co., Meerut City & Ors. Read More »

Relative Grounds for Refusal under Section 11 of the Trade Marks Act, 1999

The examination of a trademark application in India operates at two distinct levels. The first level, governed by Section 9 of the Trade Marks Act, 1999, concerns the inherent qualities of the mark itself – whether it is distinctive, whether it is descriptive, whether it offends public policy. These are the absolute grounds and they

Relative Grounds for Refusal under Section 11 of the Trade Marks Act, 1999 Read More »

Kirloskar Diesel Recon Pvt. Ltd. & Ors. vs. Kirloskar Proprietary Ltd. & Ors.

Bombay High Court | October 10, 1995 | Appeal from Order Nos. 1152, 1153 & 1154 of 1994 AIR 1996 Bom 149 Background The Kirloskar Group of Companies is one of India’s most storied industrial conglomerates, tracing its origins to 1888 when Laxmanrao Kashinath Kirloskar began a bicycle repair business in Belgaum. By 1920, the

Kirloskar Diesel Recon Pvt. Ltd. & Ors. vs. Kirloskar Proprietary Ltd. & Ors. Read More »

Absolute Grounds for Refusal under Section 9 of the Trade Marks Act, 1999

A trademark application in India does not receive registration as a matter of course. Before a mark enters the Register of Trade Marks and the statutory rights of an exclusive proprietor crystallize, the application must pass through a rigorous examination process administered by the Trade Marks Registry. That examination is governed by two distinct categories

Absolute Grounds for Refusal under Section 9 of the Trade Marks Act, 1999 Read More »

Trademark Registration – The Complete Procedure under the Trade Marks Act, 1999

A trademark is among the most commercially significant assets a business can possess. It is the sign by which consumers identify the source of goods or services, the vessel that carries a brand’s reputation and the legal instrument through which that reputation is defended. In India, the law governing the registration and protection of trademarks

Trademark Registration – The Complete Procedure under the Trade Marks Act, 1999 Read More »

Ruston & Hornsby Ltd. v. The Zamindara Engineering Co.

Supreme Court of India | September 8, 1969 | Civil Appeal No. 1274 of 1966 V. Ramaswami & J.C. Shah, JJ. Background Ruston & Hornsby Ltd., a company incorporated in England with its registered office at Lincoln, is engaged in the manufacture and sale of diesel internal combustion engines and their parts. Its Indian subsidiary,

Ruston & Hornsby Ltd. v. The Zamindara Engineering Co. Read More »

The Role of the Trade Marks Registry – Structure, Functions and Jurisdiction

Every trademark right in India passes through a single institutional gateway: the Trade Marks Registry. It is the administrative body that receives applications, conducts examination, publishes marks for opposition, grants registration, maintains the official register, and adjudicates a wide range of inter partes proceedings. Without the Registry, the statutory scheme of trademark protection under the

The Role of the Trade Marks Registry – Structure, Functions and Jurisdiction Read More »

Deceptive Similarity and the Consumer Confusion Test in Indian Trademark Law

Few questions in Indian trademark law arise more frequently, or are decided with greater consequence, than whether two competing marks are deceptively similar to each other. The resolution of this question governs whether a trademark application will be accepted or rejected by the Registrar, whether an opposition proceeding will succeed or fail, and whether an

Deceptive Similarity and the Consumer Confusion Test in Indian Trademark Law Read More »