Copyright Act

AI-Assisted vs. Fully AI-Generated Works – Where Indian Copyright Law Draws the Line

The emergence of generative artificial intelligence as a practical tool for creative production has forced copyright law to confront a question it was never designed to answer: at what point does a work cease to be the product of human creative expression and become the output of a machine? This question matters enormously, for the

AI-Assisted vs. Fully AI-Generated Works – Where Indian Copyright Law Draws the Line Read More »

Copyright Protection for Video Game Characters and Fictional Personas in India

Few questions in intellectual property law generate as much commercial consequence and as little settled doctrine as the protection of fictional characters. A memorable character the hero of a beloved video game franchise, the protagonist of a globally distributed film series, the mascot of a decades-old animated property may be worth billions of dollars in

Copyright Protection for Video Game Characters and Fictional Personas in India Read More »

AI-Generated Content and Copyright in India – Who Is the Author?

A poem written by ChatGPT. A painting produced by Midjourney from a two-line prompt. A news article drafted by a large language model trained on millions of copyrighted sources. A film score composed entirely by an algorithmic system without a human composer touching an instrument. These are not hypothetical scenarios from a speculative future; they

AI-Generated Content and Copyright in India – Who Is the Author? Read More »

Voice Cloning, Deepfakes and Performers’ Rights Under Indian Copyright Law

Technology has always unsettled the creative economy and the law has always chased to catch up. But no technological development in the history of the entertainment industry has created as direct, as immediate and as commercially devastating a threat to individual performers as generative artificial intelligence voice cloning and deepfake video synthesis. These technologies do

Voice Cloning, Deepfakes and Performers’ Rights Under Indian Copyright Law Read More »

Copyright in Traditional and Folk Art Forms Under Indian Law

India carries within its borders one of the most extraordinary concentrations of living folk and traditional artistic heritage on earth. Madhubani painting from Bihar, Warli art from Maharashtra’s tribal communities, Pattachitra scroll painting from Odisha, Baul music from the rural riverbanks of Bengal and Bangladesh, Gond art from Madhya Pradesh, Bharatanatyam and Kuchipuri and Odissi

Copyright in Traditional and Folk Art Forms Under Indian Law Read More »

Syndicate of the Press of the University of Cambridge v. B.D. Bhandari & Anr.

(RFA (OS) No. 21 of 2009) with The Chancellor, Masters and Scholars of the University of Oxford v. Narendra Publishing House & Ors. (FAO (OS) No. 458 of 2008) High Court of Delhi at New Delhi | Decided: 3 August 2011 Bench: Hon’ble Mr. Justice A.K. Sikri & Hon’ble Mr. Justice Suresh Kait Reportable Background

Syndicate of the Press of the University of Cambridge v. B.D. Bhandari & Anr. Read More »

Krishika Lulla & Ors. v. Shyam Vithalrao Devkatta & Anr.

Supreme Court of India | Decided: 15 October 2015 Criminal Appeal No. 258 of 2013 with Criminal Appeal No. 259 of 2013 Bench: Hon’ble Mr. Justice S.A. Bobde & Hon’ble Mr. Justice Madan B. Lokur Reportable Background The respondent No. 1, Shyam Vithalrao Devkatta, claimed copyright in a synopsis of a story he had written

Krishika Lulla & Ors. v. Shyam Vithalrao Devkatta & Anr. Read More »

Sholay Media and Entertainment Pvt. Ltd. & Anr. v. Parag Sanghavi & Ors.

High Court of Delhi at New Delhi | Decided: 24 August 2015 CS (OS) 1892/2006 Bench: Hon’ble Mr. Justice Manmohan Singh Background The plaintiffs, Sholay Media and Entertainment Pvt. Ltd. and its co-plaintiff, are private limited companies engaged in the business of producing, exhibiting and distributing cinematograph films. The plaintiffs claimed to be the copyright

Sholay Media and Entertainment Pvt. Ltd. & Anr. v. Parag Sanghavi & Ors. Read More »

The Chancellor, Masters & Scholars of the University of Oxford & Ors. v. Rameshwari Photocopy Services & Ors.

High Court of Delhi at New Delhi | Decided: 9 December 2016 RFA (OS) 81/2016 Bench: Division Bench Hon’ble Mr. Justice Pradeep Nandrajog & Hon’ble Mr. Justice Yogesh Khanna Background The appellants (plaintiffs before the learned Single Judge) were five academic publishers: Oxford University Press, Cambridge University Press (UK), Cambridge University Press India Pvt. Ltd.,

The Chancellor, Masters & Scholars of the University of Oxford & Ors. v. Rameshwari Photocopy Services & Ors. Read More »

John Doe orders in Indian IP law – Anton Piller, Mareva and identity-unknown defendants

The enforcement of intellectual property rights has never been straightforward in any jurisdiction, but the particular challenge of acting against infringers who cannot be identified, located, or who are likely to destroy evidence or dissipate assets before a court can reach them has demanded a category of remedies that go well beyond the conventional interim

John Doe orders in Indian IP law – Anton Piller, Mareva and identity-unknown defendants Read More »