Patent law

Koninklijke Philips Electronics N.V. v. Rajesh Bansal & Ors.

Leave a Comment / Landmark Judgements on Patents

Delhi High Court | Mukta Gupta J. | 12 July 2018 Case Numbers: CS(COMM) 24/2016; CS(COMM) 436/2017 Justice Mukta Gupta BACKGROUND The plaintiff, Koninklijke Philips Electronics N.V., a Netherlands-incorporated multinational corporation, instituted two suits alleging infringement of its Indian Patent No. 184753 relating to DVD video player technology. The patent, dated 13 February 1995, pertains

Koninklijke Philips Electronics N.V. v. Rajesh Bansal & Ors. Read More »

Standipack Private Limited & Another v. M/s Oswal Trading Co. Ltd. & Ors.

Leave a Comment / Landmark Judgements on Patents

Delhi High Court | Dr. M.K. Sharma J. | 26 May 1999 Case Number: Suit No. 2391/1998 | Citation: AIR 2000 Delhi 23 | 80 (1999) DLT 56 | 1999 IV AD (Delhi) 613 BACKGROUND The plaintiff, Standipack Private Limited, claimed to be the patentee of a pouch designed for storage and dispensing of liquids

Standipack Private Limited & Another v. M/s Oswal Trading Co. Ltd. & Ors. Read More »

Parallel Imports and Section 107A – The Bolar Exemption and Doctrine of Exhaustion in Indian Patent Law

Leave a Comment / Patent Article

Among the most practically significant yet doctrinally complex provisions of the Patents Act, 1970 is Section 107A, inserted into the Act by the Patents (Amendment) Act, 2002. In the two decades since its insertion, Section 107A has become one of the most contested and commercially consequential provisions in Indian pharmaceutical patent law, engaging questions that

Parallel Imports and Section 107A – The Bolar Exemption and Doctrine of Exhaustion in Indian Patent Law Read More »

Working of Patents in India – Section 83, Form 27 and Consequences

Leave a Comment / Patent Article

Few obligations in Indian patent law are as frequently misunderstood, as consistently neglected and as consequential in their implications as the requirement to work a patent in India. The Patents Act, 1970 does not treat the grant of a patent as the end of the patentee’s obligations to the public it treats it as the

Working of Patents in India – Section 83, Form 27 and Consequences Read More »

Hindusthan Lever Limited v. Godrej Soaps Limited and Others

Leave a Comment / Landmark Judgements on Patents

Court: High Court of Calcutta | Date of Decision: 11 April 1996 Citation: AIR 1996 CAL 367; (1997) 1 CALLT 123 (HC); 100 CWN 562; (1996) 100 Cal WN 562; (1997) 2 CivLJ 302 BACKGROUND The plaintiff, Hindusthan Lever Limited, is a leading Indian manufacturer of soaps, detergents, cleaning preparations, chemicals and fertilisers, holding over

Hindusthan Lever Limited v. Godrej Soaps Limited and Others Read More »

The PCT System and India: International Filing, National Phase Entry and Prosecution Practice

Leave a Comment / Patent Article

India’s accession to the Patent Cooperation Treaty on December 7, 1998, fundamentally transformed the landscape for both inbound and outbound patent filings. For Indian applicants seeking protection across multiple jurisdictions, the PCT provides a single-window mechanism of unmatched procedural efficiency. For foreign applicants targeting the Indian marketone of the world’s most consequential pharmaceutical, technology and

The PCT System and India: International Filing, National Phase Entry and Prosecution Practice Read More »

Claim Drafting for Indian Patents – Types, Scope and Strategy

Leave a Comment / Patent Article

If the specification is the heart of a patent application, the claims are its spine. Every structural decision in the specification how the invention is described, what embodiments are disclosed, which prior art is distinguished ultimately serves the claims, because it is the claims alone that define the legal boundary of the monopoly that the

Claim Drafting for Indian Patents – Types, Scope and Strategy Read More »

Specification Writing in Indian Patent Practice – Complete and Provisional

Leave a Comment / Patent Article

The specification is the heart of a patent application. Every other element of the application the claims, the abstract, the drawings derives its meaning and its legal validity from the specification and the quality of the specification determines, more than any other single factor, both the prospect of grant and the value of the patent

Specification Writing in Indian Patent Practice – Complete and Provisional Read More »

Section 3(d) and the Evergreening Debate in Indian Pharma Patents

Leave a Comment / Patent Article

Few provisions in the entire canon of global intellectual property law have attracted as much sustained attention, controversy and scholarly debate as Section 3(d) of the Patents Act, 1970. In the two decades since India inserted this provision into its patent statute as part of the 2005 amendment that brought the country into compliance with

Section 3(d) and the Evergreening Debate in Indian Pharma Patents Read More »