High Court of Judicature at Madras, Single Judge | Date of Decision: 16.10.2026 (Reserved on: 14.07.2026) Case Number: CMA(PT) No. 22 of 2025 Bench: Hon’ble Mr. Justice K. Kumaresh Babu BACKGROUND The Appellant, The North Face Apparel Corp, filed the present Civil Miscellaneous Appeal under Section 117A of the Patents Act, 1970, challenging an order
The North Face Apparel Corp v. Controller of Patents and Designs Read More »
High Court of Gujarat at Ahmedabad, Division Bench | Date of Decision: 30/09/2026 Case Number: R/Letters Patent Appeal No. 54 of 2015, in R/Special Civil Application No. 649/2001 Bench: Hon’ble the Chief Justice Mrs. Justice Sunita Agarwal (author) and Hon’ble Mr. Justice Divyesh A. Joshi BACKGROUND This intra-court Letters Patent Appeal was filed by the
Collector and Additional Superintendent of Stamps v. Arvind Brands Ltd. Read More »
High Court of Delhi at New Delhi | Decided: 10 September 2026 CS(COMM) No. 904 of 2026 Bench: Hon’ble Mr. Justice A.J. Bhambhani Background Hindustan Unilever Limited, the plaintiff, is a well-known consumer goods company and the proprietor of the registered trade marks VIM and SURF EXCEL in respect of dishwash and laundry detergent products
Hindustan Unilever Limited v. Kwick Living (I) Private Limited Read More »
The Madrid Protocol represents the single most significant reform to India’s international trademark posture since the enactment of the Trade Marks Act, 1999 itself. For an Indian applicant seeking to protect a brand across multiple jurisdictions, the pre-Madrid alternative was a country-by-country filing exercise involving separate national applications, separate local agents, separate fee structures and
The Madrid protocol – International trademark registration for Indian application Read More »
High Court of Delhi at New Delhi, Division Bench | Date of Decision: January 6, 2026 Case Number: RFA(OS)(COMM) 1/2026 & CM APPL. 331/2026 Bench: Hon’ble Mr. Justice C. Hari Shankar (author) and Hon’ble Mr. Justice Om Prakash Shukla BACKGROUND This appeal challenges, to a limited extent, judgment dated 19 November 2025 and order dated
Mr. Abhimanyu Prakash & Ors. v. Ferrero S.P.A & Ors. Read More »
High Court of Delhi at New Delhi, Single Judge | Date of Decision: April 30, 2026 Case Number: CS(COMM) 1134/2024 Bench: Hon’ble Mr. Justice Tejas Karia BACKGROUND The Plaintiff, Médecins Sans Frontières International (“MSF”/”Doctors Without Borders”), is an international humanitarian medical aid organization operating under the mark ‘Médecins Sans Frontières’/’Doctors Without Borders’ (“Plaintiff’s Mark”) in
Medecins Sans Frontieres International v. Dharma Productions Private Limited and Ors. Read More »
High Court of Judicature at Bombay, Nagpur Bench | Decided: 1 September 2026 Appeal Against Order No. 42 of 2026 Bench: Hon’ble Mr. Justice Y.G. Khobragade Citation: 2026:BHC-NAG:11473 Background The appellants are Tervinder Singh Jhans, M/s Barbecue a proprietary concern through its proprietor Tervinder Singh Jhans and Barbecue Food Services Pvt. Ltd., all having their
Tervinder Singh Jhans & Others v. Pankaj Rai & Others Read More »
Trademark coexistence agreements occupy a sophisticated and commercially consequential space within Indian intellectual property practice one that sits at the junction of trademark law, contract law and competition law, yet is addressed by no single statute with dedicated clarity. In a trademark register that now carries over two and a half million active marks, with
Trademark Coexistence Agreements – strategy and drafting Read More »
High Court of Delhi at New Delhi | Decided: 28 July 2026 LPA 316/2026 & CM APPL. 27819-20/2026 Bench: Hon’ble Mr. Justice V. Kameswar Rao & Hon’ble Ms. Justice Manmeet Pritam Singh Arora Background In Parle Products Pvt. Ltd. v. The Registrar of Trade Marks,The appellant, Parle Products Pvt. Ltd., is a well-known company engaged
Parle Products Pvt. Ltd. v. The Registrar of Trade Marks & Anr. Read More »
Trademark infringement in India is conventionally understood through the lens of civil litigation injunctions, damages, accounts of profits and delivery up of infringing goods. These civil remedies are well-developed, extensively litigated and occupy the centre of trademark enforcement practice. However, the Trade Marks Act, 1999 contains a parallel and considerably less-discussed enforcement architecture that is
Criminal Remedies for Trademark Infringement in India Read More »